Which of the following is NOT a last resort for survival?

Disable ads (and more) with a premium pass for a one time $4.99 payment

Prepare for the Firefighter 1C Wildland Exam with engaging study guides. Practice exams with detailed answers help you learn critical skills for success on the exam. Get exam-ready now!

The concept of survivability in wildland firefighting emphasizes proactive strategies for dealing with imminent danger. A direct attack is generally considered a primary method for combating fires, where firefighters actively engage the fire to mitigate its spread. This approach is proactive and involves tactical maneuvers to extinguish or control the fire, not a last resort.

In contrast, the other options represent strategies you might use when direct action is no longer viable, indicating that they are more about survival rather than active engagement with the fire. For instance, escaping when possible highlights the importance of retreating to safety when conditions are too hazardous. Finding a survivable area involves identifying locations that offer a better chance of withstanding fire, while choosing a shelter deployment site relates to seeking protection when direct engagement is no longer an option. Therefore, direct attack is the only choice that does not fit the context of last resort survival strategies.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy